Haiphong vs Ho Chi Minh City
Haiphong and Ho Chi Minh City are level on the CIRA Index at 64. Haiphong grades better on 1 measures, Ho Chi Minh City on 2; the same 35 measures from public sources for both.
Scores by each organisation's criteria
- CIRA Index: Haiphong 64, Ho Chi Minh City 64
- OECD: Haiphong 60, Ho Chi Minh City 61
- UN Tourism: Haiphong 64, Ho Chi Minh City 72
- UNDRR: Haiphong 52, Ho Chi Minh City 51
Theme by theme
- Demand and seasonality: Haiphong 69, Ho Chi Minh City 85
- Economy and jobs: Haiphong 67, Ho Chi Minh City 67
- Climate and hazards: Haiphong 35, Ho Chi Minh City 25
- Water and environment: Haiphong 50, Ho Chi Minh City 69
- Community and housing: Haiphong 83, Ho Chi Minh City 63
- Access and continuity: Haiphong 65, Ho Chi Minh City 63
Where Haiphong is stronger
- Extreme heat days: 11.6 days a year at or above 35°C (last 5 full years) (ERA5 reanalysis via Open-Meteo, 2021–2025). Between 5 and 15: grade 3/4.
Where Ho Chi Minh City is stronger
- Largest foreign market: 26 % of international arrivals or nights (country figure) (General Statistics Office of Vietnam / Vietnam National Authority of Tourism (VNAT), 2024). Between 20 and 30: grade 2/4.
- Water scarcity: very low (region figure) (World Bank GFDRR ThinkHazard, current (retrieved 2026)). Grade 4/4.
Country context (World Economic Forum)
- Vietnam: #52 of 110 in the WEF Travel & Tourism Development Index 2026
- Vietnam: #52 of 110 in the WEF Travel & Tourism Development Index 2026
Haiphong in full · Ho Chi Minh City in full
The CIRA Index ranking · City vs city · How the index works · CIRA Studio · Put your city in the pilot